|
Introduction References
Annotated Bibliography Questions
Stroke
Care in Europe, Emergency Medicine Role
Case
Presentation
CVD occupy from
the first to the third place in mortality rate in European countries,
and there is an important variation in adjusted mortality rates in between
countries, with other factors like sex and sociodemographic factors, producing
important variations. The data reflects a clear East-West gradient in
CVD mortality this differences can be due to risk factors or to different
models of care in which EMS can play a vital role.
Parallelism in the physiopathology
between CVD and ICD has developed a similar approach of care. The Stroke
Recovery chain is familiar to EMS members and reflects the Key elements
to produce the more favourable outcome.
Special emphasis must be put
on the identification phase in which the population knowledge of stroke
symptoms is crucial to access to Dispatch centres. The second link of
the chain, the prioritisation in dispatch center, using protocols to identify
Stroke symptoms as an emergency situation and therefore produce a high
level response. The care on scene and rapid transport to adequate center
for final diagnosis and treatment are the final elements of this chain
The representation of the process
of care as a chain reflects the importance of every element and the EMS
and ED forms part of Stroke integral care.
Key Clinical Questions
- What is situation of Stroke
care in Europe?
- What is the role of EMS?
Key Learning Points
- Important differences in
outcome may reflect deficiencies in care and identify areas that need
improvement.
- The role of Emergency Medicine
in the prehospital and in the ED is clearly define in guidelines and
consensus documents.
- Stroke patients are at risk
situation and emergency management is need.
- EMS must be integrated as
a vital part of stroke care.
- More high quality research
is need to clarify the best model of care
TOP
Stroke
Care in Europe, Emergency Medicine Role
Introduction
Stroke Care
in Europe
Setting
Europe is multiracial multicultural
continent, with more than 800.000.000 habitants, 43 countries speaking
45 languages, with and aging population (15% >65 years). This diversity
is also present when we look at de adjusted mortality rate for CVD, figures
go from the lowest in Switzerland with 64 per 100.00 habitants in males
to 273,4 per 100.000 habitants in Russia for females. This difference
has a geographical consistency sowing an East West and North South gradient
that persists in both sexes.
Stroke is also the first cause
of disability and health cost, 5% of the total health cost in England
and 6% in Finland.
Incidence of stroke follows
a similar country pattern with 147 new cases per 100.000 habitants for
males in London to 81 for females in Dijon France.
Stroke Care Process
Several European groups and
scientific societies have defined recommendations and guidelines for Stroke
Care son of then are listed below:
- Pan European Consensus Meeting
on Stroke Management, (1995);
- European Federation of Neurological
Societies Task Force, (1997);
- European Ad Hoc Consensus
Group, (1996);
- WHO Task Force on Stroke
and other Cerebrovascular Disorders, (1989).
- European Stroke Initiative
(EUSI) including: European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS),
European Neurological Society
(ENS) and European Stroke Council (ESC). (2000)
In relation to prehospital
phase and ED all of them empathize the following points:
1. Education of the population
in Stroke signs and symptoms, recommend de use of EMS.
2. Need to identify strokes
as emergency situations. Using protocols to identify Stroke symptoms
and produce a high level response in the dispatch center.
3. Transport to the hospital
must be quick enough to allow thrombolisys (3 hour window) in those
with indications.
4. Emergency stabilization
and care is necessary.
5. Transport must be done
to a hospital with Stroke Unit, with neuroimaging capability and well
organized team.
6. In the ED rapid evaluation
of vital signs and neurologic exam avoiding any delay
The implementation of these
recommendations has wide variations across Europe.
Stroke Care outcomes
Hospital based registries demonstrate
important differences in survival at 3 month in between countries and
also in between institutions of the same country. While France has a 3
month mortally of 17%, Portugal has 31%. But also in the some country
like in UK mortality ranks from 29-38%. Case mix and level of resources
used do not explain this differences, although is not clear what elements
of care must be included. Measuring functional situation using the Barthel
index similar differences are found.
Not all patients with Stroke
are admitted to hospital and this difference in practices also reflects
the East-West gradient; in WE (West Europe) non admitted stroke patients
are close to 20% while in EE (East Europe) ranks 25-60%.
CT use has a wide variation, while most WE ranks 50-95% of the patients
have a CT in EE only 5-50% have the study. The subtype of CVA also have
different distribution in WE Haemorrhagic strokes are close to18% while
EE 15-35%, this differences can explain part of the outcome results;30
days mortally in WE is 12-20% while EE ranks 25-35%.
Access to the hospital is an
important element, a quick transport increase the possibilities of thrombolysis
producing more eligible patients. Information from the publications show
than there is a wide rank from 5-40% of patients arrives in the first
3 hours after the onset of symptoms, and the same figure comes from local
cases from Spain.
Role of Emergency Medicine
Stroke patients are on a risk
situation that demands emergency medical interventions, in multicenter
European stroke study was found that 20% of the cases have dismissed level
of consciousness, and in more than 50% Systolic blood pressure was over
160 mmHg. These two situation requires medical intervention as soon as
they are identify and any delay affects outcome.
Not to much information is
publish about results of prehospital care in stroke patients. In a multicenter
study in witch two EMS models where compare (Birmingham-Paramedic versus
Bonn-Doctor) and specifically for CVA, using Mainz Score as a clinical
indicator. Those patients treated in Bonn System have a higher and significant
improvement compare to Birmingham, this results is explain because more
interventions (airway management, drugs, fluids) where use in this system,
no long term influence of this modification was analysed. Looking to this
information with all the possible bias is clear that EMS can produce modifications
on the clinical situation of ACVA patients that can influence final outcome.
EMS organization plays a vital
role in the concept of integral care of any condition. In Austria the
integration of EMS and the wide net of Stroke Units produce state of the
art results on CVA. Stroke patients arrive to hospital more than 50% in
less than 3 hours, using ground or air transport. 30% by ambulance with
doctor providing treatment, and 80% have CT in the 30 first minutes after
hospital arrival. This coordinated model demonstrated the benefices of
a close integration of EMS with the next levels of care.
TOP
Stroke
Care in Europe, Emergency Medicine Role
Reference
List
1. World Health
Organization. http://www.who.int/whosis/
2. Global Cardiovascular
Info Base. http://www.cvdinfobase.ca/
3. Charles D.A. Variations
in Stroke Incidence and Survival in 3 Areas of Europe. Stroke; 31:2074-2079.
4. Isabella Aboderin, Graham
Venables. For de Pan European Consensus Meeting on Stroke management.
Stroke Management in Europe. Journal of Internal Medicine 1996; 240:173-180.
5. Werner Hacke, Heidelberg
GermanyMarkku Kaste, Helsinki Finland, Tom Skyhoj Olsen, Copenhagn Denmark,
Jean-Marc Orgogozo Bordeaux France, Julien Bogousslavsky Lausanne Switzerland.European
Stroke Initiative (EUSI). Recommendations for Stroke Management. Organisation
of Stroke Care: Education, Referral, Emergency services and Stroke Units.
2003.http://www.eusi-stroke.com/l2_pres_intro.shtml
6. Joe Suyama, MD; Todd Crocco,
MD. Prehospital care of stroke patient. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2002; 20:537-552.
7. Mark J. Alberts, Brain
Attack Coalition. Recommendations for the Establishment of Primary Stroke
Centers. JAMA 2000; 283,3102-3109.
8. Chales DA. Wolfe, BIOMED
Study of Stroke Care Group Stroke 1999; 30:350-356.
9. M. Brainin. N Borstein,
G Boysen and V Demarin Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: Results
of the European Stroke Care Inventory Eu J Neurol 2000;7:5-10
10. R. Beech PhD; M. Ratcliffe,
MSc; K Tilling, MSc; C Wolfe MD; Hospital Services for Stroke Care.
A European Perspective
11. NU. Weir MBChB; P.A.G
Sandercock DM; S.C. Lewis PhD; D.F. Signorini PhD; C.P. Warlow MD, on
behalf of the IST Collaborative Group. Variations Between Countries
in Outcome After Stroke in International Stroke Trial (IST) Stroke 2001;32:1370-77
12. Steiner MM, Brainin M,
The participants in the Austrian Stroke Registry for Acute Stroke Units.The
quality of acute Stroke units on a nation-wide level: the Austrian Stroke
Registry for acute Stroke Units. Eur J Neurol. 2003;4:353-60
TOP
Stroke
Care in Europe, Emergency Medicine Role
Annotated
Bibliography
1. Global Cardiovascular
Info Base. http://www.cvdinfobase.ca/
WHO Collaborating Centre for Surveillance of Cardiovascular Diseases
Epidemiological Profiles of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases
in the World
2. Charles D.A. Variations
in Stroke Incidence and Survival in 3 Areas of Europe. Stroke; 31:2074-2079.
Using a population based registry differences were found in the incidence
between Erlagen(Germany), London, and Dijon(France). Using Dijon as
the base line Incidence rate was Dijon 1, London 1, 21, and Erlagem
1, 37.
3. Isabella Aboderin, Graham Venables. For de Pan European Consensus
Meeting on Stroke management. Stroke Management in Europe. Journal
of Internal Medicine 1996; 240:173-180.
Recommendations after a consensus conference produce five groups of
recommendations. In the first related to Organization of stroke services
recognized that improvement in the organization of the process of
stroke care can improve outcomes. Specifies that Stroke is a medical
emergency, but no explicitly link to emergency care was done.
4. Werner Hacke, Heidelberg
GermanyMarkku Kaste, Helsinki Finland, Tom Skyhoj Olsen, Copenhagn
Denmark, Jean-Marc Orgogozo Bordeaux France, Julien Bogousslavsky
Lausanne Switzerland.European Stroke Initiative (EUSI). Recommendations
for Stroke Management. Organisation of Stroke Care: Education, Referral,
Emergency services and Stroke Units. 2003.http://www.eusi-stroke.com/l2_pres_intro.shtml
International guidelines produced using base evidence, with expecific
references to emergency care.
5. Joe Suyama, MD; Todd
Crocco, MD. Prehospital care of stroke patient. Emerg Med Clin N Am.
2002; 20:537-552.
A explendid review of the key elements of the prehospital care: Identification,
Dispatch triage, Emergency response, Treatment an Transport to adequate
center with Stroke Unit (CT and Team) and Final diagnosis and treatment.
6. Mark J. Alberts,
Brain Attack Coalition. Recommendations for the Establishment of Primary
Stroke Centers. JAMA 2000; 283,3102-3109.
The treat of patients in Stroke Unit improves outcomes. It is recognize
the vital role of Emergency Medical Services providing timely response,
mainly with the previous experience of trauma an cardiac patients.
Recognizes the ED as a key component of the stroke team and point
the recommendations to be integrated in the team. Ed plays a vital
role selecting patients.
7. Chales DA. Wolfe,
BIOMED Study of Stroke Care Group Stroke 1999; 30:350-356.
Using a hospital based stroke care register they identify important
differences between centers comparing West countries and central Europe.
While in France and Germany dead at 3 mo are17% and 18% in Hungary
Portugal 22% and in Portugal 31%. Also found differences in the same
country UK from 29-56%.
8. M. Brainin. N Borstein, G Boysen and V Demarin Acute neurological
stroke care in Europe: Results of the European Stroke Care Inventory
Eu J Neurol 2000;7:5-10
Stroke care data from 22 countries representing 500.000.000 habitants.
The epidemiological data confirms the previous East-West gradient
for incidence, mortality rate, while and opposite gradient exist for
stroke hospitalisation or CT use. Most of the Western countries have
a fatality rate under 20% while Easter mostly are over 20%. Some of
this differences can be due to the severity with more haemorrhagic
cases. On the other hand resources like Stroke Units are more common
in the Eastern countries.
9. R. Beech PhD; M.
Ratcliffe, MSc; K Tilling, MSc; C Wolfe MD; Hospital Services for
Stroke Care. A European Perspective
This article identifies inequalities in the process of stroke care
in within and across countries. The non hospitalised Stroke patients
rank from 0 to 16% in countries included. Access to emergency CT 30-98%.
More research is needed to identify which patterns of care are the
most effective.
10. NU. Weir MBChB;
P.A.G Sandercock DM; S.C. Lewis PhD; D.F. Signorini PhD; C.P. Warlow
MD, on behalf of the IST Collaborative Group. Variations Between Countries
in Outcome After Stroke in International Stroke Trial (IST) Stroke
2001;32:1370-77
This international outcome comparation study give us Information from
this study allows us to know the clinical condition of stroke patients
and the need of emergency medical care. More then 50% of the cases
have SBP>160 mmHg, and more than 20% have depress level of consciousness.
11. Steiner MM, Brainin
M, The participants in the Austrian Stroke Registry for Acute Stroke
Units.The quality of acute Stroke units on a nation-wide level: the
Austrian Stroke Registry for acute Stroke Units. Eur J Neurol. 2003;4:353-60
The article describes the experience of Austrian Network of Stroke
Units from 1998-2000. Results related to emergency show a 57% of cases
before 3 hours arrive to hospital. 27% transported with doctor in
ambulance. CT was done in 54% in the first 30 minutes after arrival.
With 3 months mortally of 12.9%.
TOP
Stroke
Care in Europe, Emergency Medicine Role
Questions
1) What is the difference
in mortality for CVD from the Easter to the Western countries in Europe?
a. No difference
b. More mortality in EE
c. More Mortality in WE
d. The mortality is relate to sex
2) What is the difference in subtypes of CVA between WE and EE?
a. More haemorrhagic
in EE
b. More SAH in EE
c. More haemorrhagic in WE
d. More isquemic in EE
3) Identify the reasons of excess of mortality due to CVD in EU.
a. More risk
factors
b. Less resources
c. More severity
d. All of then
4) Delays in access to hospital reduces de possibility of thrombolysis,
the EMS systems have the following recommendations except one.
a. To identify
call with Stroke symptoms
b. To transport to the nearest hospital
c. To do a quick transport
d. To alert the Stroke Team
5) How much 3 months mortality can be reduce?
a. To 13%
b. To 15%
c. To 18%
d. To 20%
1. Answer b.
EE have higher incidence and mortality ratios or 3 months mortality.
2. Answer a.
EE have a higher incidence of Haemorrhagic strokes and this produces
a more severity group, explain part of the excess of mortality.
3. Answer d.
All elements can take part in the excess in mortality.
4. Answer b.
The recommendation is quick transport to the hospital with Stroke Unit,
not to the nearest one.
5. Answer a.
From publications we know that good integration of the prehospital with
a net of stroke units can produce 3 months mortality as low as 13%.
|