Issues Surrounding the Management of Patients Who Present to
the ED with Subtherapeutic Phenytoin Levels and a History of Seizures


Case Presentation

A 35 year-old otherwise healthy male with a history of a seizure disorder since childhood presents to the emergency department with ambulance personnel after having had a seizure. The patient was postictal upon ambulance personnel arrival but in the emergency department he has a normal mental status. His last seizure was approximately 2 years ago. He ran out of his phenytoin approximately 2 weeks ago and has not picked up the prescription that is waiting for him at a local pharmacy. He has normal vital signs and a normal physical exam. His serum phenytoin level is undetectable.


Key Learning Points:

  • No well designed study has addressed the short term rate of seizure recurrence and the short term rate and severity of adverse events by directly comparing any of the common contemporary dosing strategies used to treat a patient with who presents to the emergency department after having had a seizure with a “subtherapeutic” phenytoin level. A serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L can be achieved by all of the common contemporary dosing strategies including intravenous loading, oral loading and starting/restarting oral maintenance dosing.

  • Fewer adverse local effects (phlebitis, purple glove syndrome and tissue necrosis) and fewer adverse systemic effects (impairment of myocardial contractility, dysrhythmias, hypotension and cardiac arrest) are associated with intravenous fosphenytoin administration when compared to intravenous phenytoin administration.

  • This difference in adverse effects between parenteral phenytoin and fosphenytoin is believed to be in part related to the fact that parenteral phenytoin preparations contain propylene glycol (40%) and ethanol (10%) and are adjusted to a pH of 12. Fosphenytoin which is more water soluble does not contain these same diluents and has a more physiologic pH of 8.6 to 9.

  • Fosphenytoin is significantly more expensive than intravenous phenytoin.

TOP

Issues Surrounding the Management of Patients Who Present to
the ED with Subtherapeutic Phenytoin Levels and a History of Seizures

Introduction


What does the medical literature say are the options for treatment?


What is the most effective phenytoin or fosphenytoin dosing strategy for preventing short term seizure recurrence in a patient with a pre-existing seizure disorder who presents to the emergency department within 24 hours of having had a seizure without status epilepticus and who is determined to have a “subtherapeutic” serum phenytoin level? There is much debate among emergency physicians as to the safest, most efficient and cost effective way to treat a patient who has had a recent seizure and has a subtherapeutic serum phenytoin level.

Common contemporary dosing strategies include:

1. Administering an intravenous loading dose of phenytoin or fosphenytoin and then starting/restarting daily oral maintenance dosing

2. Administering an oral loading dose of phenytoin and then starting/restarting daily oral maintenance dosing

3. Starting/restarting daily oral maintenance dosing without administering a loading dose
Emergency physicians should understand that the most important measure of a particular antiepileptic drug dosing strategy should be efficacy in preventing seizure recurrence when viewed in conjunction with adverse events and cost.



What is the relationship between a “therapeutic” serum phenytoin level and the prevention of seizures?

Most laboratories report a “therapeutic” serum phenytoin level between 10-20 mg/L. The term “therapeutic” serum phenytoin level is a misleading since many patients remain seizure free at serum levels less than 10 mg/L and some patients may require a serum level greater than 20 mg/L to control their seizures. (Carter, Leppik 1983) Patients are more likely to have adverse effects when their serum phenytoin level rises above 20 mg/dL but many patients will experience adverse effects at “therapeutic” levels. (Ambrosetto, Product information) Most pharmacokinetic studies use achievement of a serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L as the primary outcome variable. Although achieving a serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L may be a measure of pharmacokinetic efficacy, a more relevant measure of clinical efficacy should be prevention of seizure recurrence with an acceptable adverse effects profile.



What are the pharmacokinetic concerns as they relate to achieving a serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L?

A serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L can be achieved by any of the common contemporary dosing strategies.

Oral phenytoin dosing at the "appropriate" daily maintenance dose, without a loading dose, can achieve a serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L in 3-7 days. (Buchanan, Gugler, Svensmark). Although many common references recommend that adult dosing be initiated at 300 mg per day, many patients will not achieve a serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L at this daily dose. (Physician's Desk Reference) Two volunteer studies showed that less than 20% of adult patients taking 300 mg per day achieved a serum level > 10 mg/L. (Buchanan, Gugler) The reasons for this are multifactorial and include failure to dose the medication based upon a patients weight and individual differences in metabolism. Regardless of the initial dosing strategy employed patients require a daily maintenance dosing to maintain their serum level > 10 mg/L. Patients who are discharged on daily maintenance dosing, even those that receive a loading dose, need follow-up to make sure that they are receiving the appropriate daily maintenance dose of phenytoin.
Intravenous loading of either phenytoin or fosphenytoin usually achieves a peak serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L within minutes following completion of the infusion. (Carducci, Kugler, Leppik, Salem).

Oral loading of phenytoin as a single dose and in divided doses can produce a serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L in some cases within 3-10 hours and in most cases within 24 hours following the initial ingestion. (Osborn, Ratanakorn, Record, Wildner 1973

Intramuscular loading of fosphenytoin as a single dose and in divided dose can reliably produce serum phenytoin level > 10 mg/L in most cases within 1-2 hours and in almost all cases within 24 hours following injection. (Boucher, Browne 1989, Kugler, Uthman, Wilder 1996)

 

What adverse effects are associated with oral, intravenous and intramuscular dosing of phenytoin and fosphenytoin?

Irrespective of the dosing strategy, the most common adverse effects associated with phenytoin and fosphenytoin include ataxia, nystagmus, tremor and somnolence. (Wilder 1996)

Fosphenytoin, the disodium phosphate ester of phenytoin, is a parenteral phenytoin pro-drug that is rapidly converted to phenytoin by blood and tissue phosphatases following intravenous and intramuscular injection. (Browne, Leppich) Many of the adverse local effects including phlebitis, purple glove syndrome and tissue necrosis associated with intravenous and intramuscular phenytoin, occur much less frequently when fosphenhytoin is administered by these routes. (Comer, Marchetti, O’Brien, Kilarski) Many of the adverse systemic effects including impairment of myocardial contractility, dysrhythmias, hypotension and cardiac arrest associated with intravenous phenytoin administration, have also been reported much less frequently with intravenous fosphenytoin administration. (Earnest, Russell, York). This difference in adverse effects between parenteral phenytoin and fosphenytoin is believed to be in part related to the fact that parenteral phenytoin preparations contain propylene glycol (40%) and ethanol (10%) and are adjusted to a pH of 12. Fosphenytoin which is more water soluble does not contain these same diluents and has a more physiologic pH of 8.6 to 9. (Browne 1996) 

Although it is difficult to make comparisons between studies with respect to adverse events since most studies do not report adverse effects in a standardized form and often do not evaluate for their severity, fosphenytoin appears to have a better safety profile than intravenously and intramucularly administered phenytoin. (Boucher, Henken, Jameson)

 

What are the pharmacoeconomic concerns as they relate to phenytoin and fosphenytoin?

The acquisition costs of fosphenytoin are considerably more than those for either parenteral or oral phenytoin products. In 4/2002 it costs approximately $95.00 for 1000 mg of fosphenytoin, $5.50 for 1000 mg of parenteral phenytoin and $5.00 for 1000 mg of oral phenytoin. (Kuffner). These prices are consistent with those previously published. (Browne 1998)


What is the risk of seizure recurrence in a patient who is discharged from the emergency department?

Data on the risk of seizure recurrence is commonly reported in years not days. (Hauser) The baseline rate of seizure recurrence within a few days to a few weeks of emergency department discharge for the patient population of interest is unknown. Without knowing the background prevalence of short-term seizure recurrence, individual studies that address the rate of seizure short-term recurrence are difficult to interpret and compare.

It is difficult to make comparisons between the few studies that did report the rate of seizure recurrence since most of these studies included patients with many different etiologies for their seizures. The underlying cause of seizures is likely an important variable in determining the rate of seizure recurrence. (Cranford) Based upon the available literature it appears that the rate of seizure recurrence following emergency department discharge varies from 6-20%. (Cranford, Huff, Leppick, Osborn).

No well-designed study has compared the rate of seizure recurrence for patients with different etiologies of seizures using any of the common contemporary dosing strategies.

 

What guidelines currently exist?

There are no commonly distributed guidelines that specifically address the issue of dosing strategy for preventing short term seizure recurrence in a patient with a pre-existing seizure disorder who presents to the emergency department within 24 hours of having had a seizure without status epilepticus and who is determined to have a “subtherapeutic” serum phenytoin level. This is likely due to the fact that the medical literature does not contain enough information to answer this question.

 

If no guidelines exist, what would you recommend?

Emergency physicians who understand the pharmacokinetic, pharmacoeconomic and adverse event profiles of phenytoin and fosphenytoin as well as the limitations of the available medical literature are best suited to help their patients make informed decisions regarding the different dosing strategies.

When I want to achieve a “therapeutic” serum phenytoin level as soon as possible or prior to emergency department discharge I administer either fosphenytoin or phenytoin intravenously.

Examples:

1. Patient had a prolonged seizure.

2. Patient has a recent history of multiple seizures or status epilepticus.

3. Upon emergency department discharge the patient is likely to be in a environment/situation where another seizure carries an increased risk of morbidity/mortality. Such environments/situations include operating a motor vehicle or dangerous machinery, a hazardous occupational setting, homelessness and suboptimal social situations.

4. Medicolegal concerns


I always want to minimize the risk of adverse local and systemic effects associated with intravenous loading, so, when available, I administer fosphenytoin.
Examples:

1. Patients who have poor intravenous access or small intravenous catheters (children)

2. Patients are agitated.

3. There may be suboptimal supervision during dosing.

4. Medicolegal concerns.

 

When I want to minimize the amount of time a patient is in the emergency department, when cost is an especially important issue and when the indication for phenytoin therapy is questionable, I administer oral phenytoin.

Examples:

1. Emergency department resources are at a critical level.

2. Alcoholic patients whose seizures are likely secondary to alcohol withdrawal.

TOP

Issues Surrounding the Management of Patients Who Present to
the ED with Subtherapeutic Phenytoin Levels and a History of Seizures

References

1.Ambrosetto G, Tassinari CA, Baruzzi A et al: Phenytoin encephalopathy as probable idiosyncratic reaction: case report. Epilepsia 1977; 18:405.

2.Boucher BA, Feler CA, Dean C, et al. The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of fosphenytoin after intramuscular and intravenous administration in neurosurgery patients. Pharmacotherapy 1996;16:638-645.

3.Browne TR, Davoudi H, Donn KH, et al. Bioavailability of ACC-9653 (Phenytoin prodrug). Epilepsia 1989;30:S27-S32.

4.Browne TR. Intravenous phenytoin. Cheap but not necessarily a bargain. Neurology 1998;51:942-943.

5.Buchanan RA, Kinkel AW, Goulet JR. The metabolism of diphenylhydantoin (Dilantin) following once-daily administration. Neurology 1972;22:126-130.

6.Carducci B, Hedges JR, Beal JC, et al. Emergency phenytoin loading by constant intravenous infusion. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13:1027-1032.

7.Carter CH. Use of parenteral diphenylhydantoin (Dilantin) sodium in control of status epilepticus. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1958;79:136-137.

8.Comer JB: Extravasation from intravenous phenytoin. Am J Intrav Ther Clin Nutr 1984;11:23-29.

9.Cranford RE, Leppik IE, Patrick B, et al. Intravenous phenytoin: clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects. Neurology 1978;28:874-880.

10.Earnest EP, Marx JA, Drury LR: Complications of IV phenytoin for acute treatment of seizures: recommendations for usage. JAMA 1983;6:762-765.

11.Gugler R, Manion CV, Azarnoff DL. Phenytoin: pharmacokinetics and bioavailability. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1976;19:135-142.

12.Hauser WA, Rich SS, Lee JRJ, et al. Risk of recurrent seizures after two unprovoked seizures. N Engl J Med 1998;338:429-434.

13.Heneken SA, Knapp LE, Smith MF, et al. Tolerance of intravenous fosphenytoin (Cerebrex) compared with Dilantin: an overview of 3 studies. Epilepsia 1996;37(suppl 5):157 (abstract).

14.Huff JS, Morris DL, Kothari RU, et al. Emergency department management of patients with seizures:a multicenter study. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:622-628.

15.Jamerson BD, Dukes GE, Brouwer KR, et al. Venous irritation related to intravenous administration of phenytoin versus fosphenytoin. Pharmacotherapy 1994;14:47-52.

16.Kilarski DJ, Buchanan C, Von Behren L. Soft-tissue damage associated with intravenous phenytoin. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1186-1187.

17.Kuffner EK: personal communication with hospital pharmacy 10/2001.

18.Kugler AR, Knappp LE, Eldon MA. Rapid attainment of therapeutic phenytoin concentrations following administration of loading doses of fosphenytoin: a meta-analysis. Neurology 1996;46:A176.

19.Leppik IE, Patrick BK, Cranford RE. Treatment of acute seizures and status epilepticus with intravenous phenytoin. Adv Neurol 1983;34:447-451.

20.Marchetti A, Magar R, Fisher J, et al. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of intravenous fosphenytoin (Cerebyx) versus phenytoin (Dilantin) in hospital emergency departments. Clin Ther 1996;18:953-966.

21.O’Brien TJ, Cascino GD, So EL, et al. Incidence and clinical consequence of the purple glove syndrome in patients receiving intravenous phenytoin. Neurology 1998;51:1034-1039.
22.Osborn HH, Zisfein J, Sparano R. Single-dose oral phenytoin loading. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:407-412.

23.Product Information: Dilantin Ň phenytoin. Parke-Davis.

24.Rantanakorn D, Kaojarern S, Phuapradit P, et al. Single oral loading dose of phenytoin: a pharmacokinetics study. J Neurolo Sci 1997;147:89-92.

25.Record KE, Rapp RP, Young B, et al. Oral phenytoin loading in adults: rapid achievement of therapeutic plasma levels. Ann Neurol 1979;5:268-270.

26.Russell MA, Bousvaros G: Fatal results from diphenylhydantoin administered intravenously. JAMA 1968;206:2118-2119.

27.Salem RB, Wilder BJ, Yost RI, et al. Rapid infusion of phenytoin sodium loading dose. Am J Hosp Pharm 1981;38:354-357.

28.Svensmark O, Schiller PJ, Buchthal F. 5-5-Diphenylhydantoin (Dilantin) blood levels after oral or intravenous dosage in man. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 1960;16:331-346.

29.Uthman BM, Wilder BJ, Ramsay RE. Intramuscular use of fosphenytoin: an overview. Neurology 1996;46:S24-S28.

30.Wilder BJ, Serrano EE, Ramsey RE. Plasma diphenylhydantoin levels after loading and maintenance doses. Clin Pharcol Ther 1973;14:797-801.

31.Wilder BJ, Campbell K, Ramsay RE, et al. Safety and tolerance of multiple dose of intramuscular fosphenytoin substituted for oral phenytoin in epilepsy or neurosurgery. Arch Neurol 1996;53:764-768.

32.York RC, Coleridge ST. Cardiopulmonary arrest following intravenous phenytoin loading. Am J Emerg Med 1988;6:255-259.

TOP

Issues Surrounding the Management of Patients Who Present to
the ED with Subtherapeutic Phenytoin Levels and a History of Seizures

Questions

1. What is the incidence of recurrent seizures within 24 hours in patients discharged from the ED?

a. 10%
b. 20%
c. 50%
d. unknown

2. What side effect of intravenous phenytoin is avoided completely when fosphenytoin is used?

a. Cardiac arrhythmia
b. Hypotension
c. Ataxia
d. Purple glove syndrome

3. What is the quickest way to attain a therapeutic phenytoin level?

a. IM fosphenytoin
b. IV phenytoin
c. IV fosphenytoin
d. B & C are both correct

4. What is the cheapest loading strategy for phyentoin?

a. Oral loading with phenytoin.
b. IM fosphenytoin
c. IV fosphenytoin
d. IV phenytoin

5. Which of the following is true?

a. The therapeutic levels of 10-20 is the goal for all patients.
b. Seizure control is the goal regardless of serum levels.
c. All patients need a level of at least 10 mg/L for seizure control.
d. Levels are overutilized and mean little.


Answers

1. Answer d.
The rate of seizure recurrence in discharged ED patients is unknown.

2. Answer d.
Purple glove syndrome is avoided with fosphenytoin administration. Cardiac side effects may be less common but still occur.

3. Answer c.
Intravenous fosphenytoin, because it may be more rapidly administered, will give higher levels more quickly.

4. Answer a.
Oral loading with phenytoin is the least expensive strategy.

5. Answer b.
Seizure control is the goal, not an arbitrary level.

TOP